12 Comments
User's avatar
Prasad K's avatar

GEM is a big scam just like CSC which was booming like anything and disappeared just like that. You can write 1 article on CSC and how one central minister lost job due to it.

On GeM there are several issues apart from mentioned in article.

Pre-defined categories are forced on buyers and sellers even when specifications are different. To safeguard GeM, they are taking undertaking from buyers that pre-defined categories are correct even when they rarely match. The support system is pathetic for buyers as well as sellers.

Vendor assessment is another pain area as it is outsourced to RITES which is corrupt beyond comparison. Pay money to get things done, documents or no documents.

Then there are transaction charges which were never associated with any online portal. Sellers add it to products or services cost which ultimately needs to be paid by buyer or effectively govt itself.

Kashish Kapoor's avatar

Thanks for sharing these with us. We will also keep a track on all this and keep learning.

shashank sharma's avatar

Guys, a small request 🙌

Daily Brief works because of 3 things:

→ Detailed stories

→ Connected stories

→ Variety

Please keep experimenting with new formats and products, but protect the core: Daily Brief.

For me, it’s not just a news brief. It’s a way to discover 300+ stories, connect ideas, and compound knowledge every day.

I genuinely believe Daily Brief will become more valuable with time—so please experiment around it, not with its core.

It’s actually one of the main reasons I’m here. ❤️

Snehaas's avatar

one thing I'm curious about does gem actually make MSMEs more competitive in the long run or does it mainly give them access to a much larger buyer? Because if a significant part of their growth becomes dependent on government procurement, could that eventually create a different kind of dependency?

Ashish V Orpe's avatar

Thanks for the chart on vehicle registrations. Would be nice to have granular data about vehicle registrations based on type, value and number per person. Perhaps, it may explain the differences?

Sudeesh Shanmugasundaram's avatar

I miss the second deepdive post already 😭. That's my tea-time ritual. Anyway Shout out to the entire team for their detailed and dedicated research and articulating it really well.

Kashish Kapoor's avatar

Hi Sudeesh, feedback taken. Also thanks for the kind words :)

Ashish kanojiya's avatar

Thanks for keeping only one stories. To be honest, i didn't understand that much, felt like it is mixed and the reason could be that the topic was new for me. If you could make it section wise summary of past, objective, what went bad and good and what is currently happening, might could have helped in better understanding.

Thank you so much

Kashish Kapoor's avatar

Hey Ashish, thanks for the feedback. Was it that confusing? Will make sure to draft the stories in a more consumable format.

Ashish kanojiya's avatar

Yes was bit confusing

vijayam3mad@gmail.com's avatar

Honestly I didn't read completely.

I can confidently say that what ever is done regarding e procurement, till the activity results in some sort of break in with regard to cash flows all costs will be accounted towards public funds,naturally some part of the related activities do not contribute towards positive cash flows,except those activities all other work done will be sold at throw away prices to vested interests like donors of electoral bonds ,justifying logic will be government need not be present in markets where ever private parties are ready with capital.

Obviously 99 percent of MSME stake holders who have registered and using the e procurement project are not going to get any benefit.

Everything is fair in markets.

David Vs Goliath stories I different formats will continue to be told .

User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 18
Comment removed
Miguel Raman's avatar

username checks out..